5 ms·
And a more "industry friendly" government is going to let the wireless companies provide crappy service, lie about it, and take the funds.
by nitwit005 2y ago
And a more "industry friendly" government is going to let the wireless companies provide crappy service, lie about it, and take the funds.
- esseph 2y agoYou clearly have a bone to pick with large lte carriers, but there's a lot of licensed and unlicensed wireless providing service to millions of people all over the world.
- nitwit005 2y agoThey have admited in court to lying to both consumers, and the government, about their products. Fines have been issued for the same. This is just reality I'm afraid.
- esseph 2y ago"Wireless" seems to mean seemingly something like Verizon to you, as opposed to thousands and thousands of regional wireless providers using microwave radios and things like 3.65Ghz CBRS.
- hn_acker 2y agoDo you mean that the Trump administration is not an "industry friendly" government? I don't know if Trump and his agency heads care about industries so much as specific companies. Also, in regard to broadband, Trump and FCC chair Brendan Carr are quite industry friendly. Carr wrote a Project 2025 chapter in which he favored decreasing the FCC's regulations even further, and prioritizing subsidies toward satellite internet from Starlink and Kuiper [1]. (Let's not forget Ajit Pai, but Pai had a filter compared to Carr. I don't think Pai would've written a Project 2025 chapter.) [1] https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/brendan-carr-fcc-project-2025/ https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/brendan-carr-fcc-proj...
- nitwit005 2y agoYou read it backward. I expect them to be more than just friendly.