3 ms·
As it happened with the other startups that were acquired by IBM, this too shall pass through the digestion system of the dinosaur and ejected out as a dump. Ha
by zkmon 2y ago
As it happened with the other startups that were acquired by IBM, this too shall pass through the digestion system of the dinosaur and ejected out as a dump. Hashicorp products are showing the signs of a legacy thing already. IBM is the nursing home for these sort of aging stuff.
I'm a heavy user of Terraform and Vault products. Both do not belong to this era. Also worked for a startup acquired and dumped by IBM.
- BrandoElFollito 2y ago> I'm a heavy user of Terraform and Vault products. Both do not belong to this era. So do you find Terraform and Vault good or bad? (sorry, not a native English speaker and I had problems to transcript the sentence)
- alexjplant 2y agoWhat are the modern equivalents? For Terraform I'd imagine it's Pulumi or OpenTofu but what is it for Vault? Last I checked OpenBao didn't seem to have much juice but it's been a minute since I did so. Or are there unrelated projects in this space that are on the same trajectory as Hashicorp was a decade ago?
- cyberpunk 2y agoCrossplane for TF. Secrets whatever your cloud provider has (Google secrets manager etc).
- nunez 2y agoLol, respectfully no. Crossplane is excellent but you need to understand CRDs and kubectl at what I'd consider n intermediate level to really grok it whereas Terraform's CLI is almost fool-proof. Relying on cloud key vaults is expensive and locks you in. Vault and Consul can run anywhere, even in your toaster. They also support those same KMS. Also, dead easy TUI and GUI with Vault Enterprise
- alsoforgotmypwd 2y agoThem, CA, and Broadcom.
- nunez 2y agoWhat, in this era, replaces secrets handling in Kubernetes in a way thats easy for most devs to pick up? What, in this era, replaces provisioning cloudy stuff that doesn't require heaps of YAML or a bootstrap Kubernetes cluster for operators to run within?