3 ms·

Your original comment opened with: You are lying. This is an ad hominem which assumes intent unknown to anyone other than the person to whom you replied. S

Your original comment opened with: You are lying. This is an ad hominem which assumes intent unknown to anyone other than the person to whom you replied. Subsequently railing against comment rankings and enumerating curt summaries of other comments does not help either.

anoncareer0212 2y ago
Lying is defined as "used with reference to a situation involving deception or founded on a mistaken impression." What am I missing here? Those weren't curt summaries, they were quotes! And not pull quotes, they were the unedited beginning of each claim!
- AdieuToLogic 2y ago
  >> This is an ad hominem which assumes intent unknown to anyone other than the person to whom you replied. > What am I missing here? Intent. Neither you nor I know what the person to whom you replied had. > Those weren't curt summaries, they were quotes! And not pull quotes, they were the unedited beginning of each claim! Maybe the more important part of that sentence was: Subsequently railing against comment rankings ... But you do you. I commented as I did in hope it helped address what I interpreted as confusion regarding how the posts were being received. If it did not help, I apologize.
  - anoncareer0212 2y ago
    >>> This is an ad hominem which assumes intent unknown to anyone other than the person to whom you replied. >> [elided] What am I missing here? > Intent. Neither you nor I know what the person to whom you replied had. Here's the part you elided: "I looked up the definition [of lying]. It says "used with reference to a situation involving deception or founded on a mistaken impression." That makes it quite clear whether or not I'm missing "intent". This also makes it quite clear that I am not making an ad hominem. I am using a simple, everyday, word used to describe the act of advancing false claims, whether through deception or mistaken impression.

anoncareer0212 2y ago

Lying is defined as "used with reference to a situation involving deception or founded on a mistaken impression." What am I missing here? Those weren't curt summaries, they were quotes! And not pull quotes, they were the unedited beginning of each claim!

AdieuToLogic 2y ago
>> This is an ad hominem which assumes intent unknown to anyone other than the person to whom you replied. > What am I missing here? Intent. Neither you nor I know what the person to whom you replied had. > Those weren't curt summaries, they were quotes! And not pull quotes, they were the unedited beginning of each claim! Maybe the more important part of that sentence was: Subsequently railing against comment rankings ... But you do you. I commented as I did in hope it helped address what I interpreted as confusion regarding how the posts were being received. If it did not help, I apologize.
- anoncareer0212 2y ago
  >>> This is an ad hominem which assumes intent unknown to anyone other than the person to whom you replied. >> [elided] What am I missing here? > Intent. Neither you nor I know what the person to whom you replied had. Here's the part you elided: "I looked up the definition [of lying]. It says "used with reference to a situation involving deception or founded on a mistaken impression." That makes it quite clear whether or not I'm missing "intent". This also makes it quite clear that I am not making an ad hominem. I am using a simple, everyday, word used to describe the act of advancing false claims, whether through deception or mistaken impression.