4 ms·

The fact that this would require a constitutional amendment makes me think this is more about collecting names to later pester for money than anything else. I w

The fact that this would require a constitutional amendment makes me think this is more about collecting names to later pester for money than anything else. I wouldn't even take it seriously. "Make bank. Troll the libs." The people behind this see it as a win-win. Deep breaths, people. Deep breaths.

haswell 2y ago
> I wouldn't even take it seriously. Things are where they are today because a lot of people didn’t take the extreme things politicians said seriously. While I agree with a message of taking deep breaths and not freaking out, people should take this seriously.
- rodgerd 2y ago
  Before the election: "Project 2025 isn't real". Now: Oh you better believe it's real.
- stogot 2y ago
  Lookup the constitutional ratification process. It ain’t happening
  - sblom 2y ago
    They have three other approaches that they're considering as well. (Check the About page on TFA.)
mcphage 2y ago
Why, do you think they wouldn’t pass it given the opportunity?
- deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
rsynnott 2y ago
Yup. See Bannon's 'Build the Wall' scam. This sort of thing kind of selects for easy marks.