4 ms·
That sounds reasonable, but they could have worded it differently. They first statement about DX: > or write new replacements (or remove the code using them e
by nicce 2y ago
That sounds reasonable, but they could have worded it differently.
They first statement about DX:
> or write new replacements (or remove the code using them entirely) for the following libraries;
But, they say that binary is proprietary regardless, no conditions. So it is very difficult to say.
If the code compiles without assets (no mention about them, it sounds like it should compile), then the resulting binary should be free to use. Missing runtime assets are different problem, and separate from the binary usage permissions.
- account42 2y agoThey don't say the binaries are proprietary. "To use the compiled binaries, you must own the game." is not a statement about licensing, which is why it is not under the "license" section. It's a statement about completeness of the repository: it doesn't include the game data which you need to obtain separately buy buying the game. This is pretty much standard for open source releases of old games.