>Section 230 needs to go because people get banned or shadow banned for all types of reasons. What does people getting banned or shadow-banned have to do with

>Section 230 needs to go because people get banned or shadow banned for all types of reasons. What does people getting banned or shadow-banned have to do with this? Section 230 is about protecting the host of 3rd-party content from liability. Beyond that, the host still has their rights to choose what they want to host, enforce what rules they want to enforce, and ban/shadow-ban whoever they want. With or without Section 230, private companies can still ban you whenever they please, for whatever reason they please. As is their right to do so. If anything, adding additional liability to hosts (via repealing Section 230) will likely make them even more zealous in who they decide to ban.