5 ms·
Number 3 Startup Hub?
So it's pretty obvious that the Bay Area is startup hub #1, and Boston is #2, but what is #3?
New York? Boulder? Chicago? Seattle?
Follow-up question - what cities that are not the top three seem to have the most potential to become #3?
- ivankirigin 19y agoSeattle, I'm told.
- pg 19y agoYes, probably Seattle, or maybe Austin.
- far33d 19y agoAustin. I didn't even think of that. Who's the catalyst there?
- jsjenkins168 19y agoUniversity of Texas, National Instruments, AMD, Dell are some of the big contributors of talent. Tech stuff is growing here, and there are unfortunately some growing pains as a result. The startup culture is still not what you'd see in silicon valley, but I'd say its improving. Incidentally, there's been a growing trend of Californians moving to Austin.
- zach 19y agoAustin is like the only city in 750 miles with a substantial high-tech background and a creative-class culture, isn't it? I've spent time in Dallas (home of Texas Instruments) and while it is a nice working-class metroplex, Austin seems to have far more of the character of a startup hub. Same thing with St. Louis, I understand. On the other hand, Lawrence, Kansas has the character but not the high-tech (and it's kinda little).
- mrevelle 19y agoAustin also has Univ. of Texas - ranked seventh in CS research. The startup I'm involved with is planning on opening up offices there when it's time to grow.
- ivankirigin 19y agoAlso, the slogan of the town is "Keep Austin Weird". I like it.
- Xichekolas 19y agoFunny you should mention Lawrence and Austin in the same post. As a current resident of Lawrence, I can attest that this would be a great town to start a startup in, but there seems a definite lack of interest from the CS grads. Everyone seems bent on a big paycheck at Sprint or Cerner or Garmin. I actually like Austin because it's like a bigger Lawrence, but never actually lived there. All I really wish is for a place with a bunch of nerds and some fiber-to-the-home. Sadly, AT&T owns us here and something that fast will probably never happen.
- aggieben 18y agoDallas has a substantial high-tech background and has an interesting creative class, but there's not much intersection between the two. It also doesn't help much that the business attitudes in Dallas are very traditional and "corporate" (not sure how else to explain it). It's a shame, too, because there are 2-3 decent universities here, and various swarms of talent, but absolutely zero community. Plano and Richardson probably fare better than most places with respect to interesting new companies and tech startups, but they've got a long way to go. I'd probably bet on Plano, if I had to choose. They've got some cultural outlets, an interesting historic downtown, a handful of technology companies, and it's a nice place to live with decent local governments, and it's nearby UT-Dallas, which is the best technology school in the Dallas Metro area (although not flagship like UT and TAMU).
- JMiao 19y agodon't forget the game developers.
- mattculbreth 19y agoI'm hoping for Atlanta to your second question. Quite sure it's not #3 now but there's a few of us working on it.
- run4yourlives 19y agoToo US Centric no? Canada has got some pretty interesting startup scenes, Vancouver, Waterloo area and Ottawa come to mind. And Europe is certainly not to be forgotten about, let alone India as well. I'd be interested to see how things compare globally, although I think you've got 1 and 2 pegged.
- comatose_kid 19y agoWhat's in Ottawa? (I grew up there)...
- run4yourlives 19y agothere's a few ror things happening there, the guys behind shopify I think.
- electric 19y ago"What's in Ottawa?" A lot of non-Web2.0 stuff. Like wireless, telecom, computing, etc.
- comatose_kid 19y agoRight - I'm aware of telecom (I worked for a telecom when I lived there), but I mean does anyone know of interesting startups, web 2.0 or otherwise?
- far33d 19y agoI'm not sure that there's a non-US city that is a contender for #3....
- falsestprophet 19y agoMontreal?
- samb 19y agoit's not chicago, but it should be.
- rrival 19y agoWhat's the story with Chicago. You'd think with 37signals, feedburner and ... I can't think of a prominent 3rd, you'd get a local startup community slightly more active than TechCocktail...
- far33d 19y agoThreadless is the third.
- pg 19y agoOne YC-funded startup is there: Inkling Markets. http://inklingmarkets.blogspot.com/2007/06/inkling-is-hiring.html http://inklingmarkets.blogspot.com/2007/06/inkling-is-hiring...
- bmaier 19y agoChicago is just getting close to reaching critical mass. The startups that succeeded here before did little to foster community. The startups here now are coming around to the idea of a start up community. It should be interesting to see how it plays out. The other problem here is that a bunch of the good hackers go to places like Citadel rather than do a startup.
- rrival 19y agoSounds like we should get a Chicago news.yc meetup going. I'm thinking something more frequent than Tech Cocktail, is there a Chicago OpenCoffee Club yet? I know someone's working on a StartupWeekend here: http://startupweekendchicago.wetpaint.com/ http://startupweekendchicago.wetpaint.com/
- rwebb 19y agoKeith Schacht does chicagobeta meetups and gets very good attendance (http://chicagobeta.com http://chicagobeta.com). He also runs http://freshwaterventure.com http://freshwaterventure.com.
- rabpdx 19y agoPortland, OR
- ahsonwardak 19y agoI would hope that it would be DC, but it's probably not. If we're talking about web startups. Could it be NYC?
- mangodrunk 19y agoDC is for enterprise Java programmers and only big government contractors. I think the general job market in DC is ranked #1 though.
- oditogre 19y agoRe: Boulder: Why not Fort Collins? Close to Denver, beautiful area, nice weather, college town, and - more than anything else - the place is just loaded with young people, and local businesses seem geared towards a younger market more so than most any place I can think of.
- ciderdude 19y agoI'm thinking of moving to Boulder from Silicon Valley (Palo Alto) simply because the cost of doing business is so insanely high here. My apartment rent has gone up $1200 over the past 5 years, the traffic sucks, taxes are high, wages are inflated, and we don't need to raise capital. There are ways to deal with these factors (BART, biking to work, cooking at home, handing out equity in lieu of cash, etc...). But, why bother when there are more affordable places to do business in the U.S.? I'm looking for a place in the U.S. that meets three criteria: (1) a great year-round outdoor lifestyle with lots of hiking trails, mountain biking terrain, and possibly rock-climbing and/or skiing (2) young, smart people (3) affordable living (rental prices, food prices, traffic) (4) a nearby university with a top-40 School of Engineering (5) not a resort/retirement community Right now I'm looking at Ventura, CA (ocean sports are a good substitute for moutain sports), Boulder, or Bozeman Montanta. Neither Ventura nor Boulder are "cheap", but they are a bargain compared to Palo Alto. Ventura is within 40min of UCSB (Santa Barbara is too expensive) and Boulder is obviously a college town. We're keeping our servers in a Bay Area datacenter, but there really is no reason to stay here since our company is profitable and cash-flow positive (an algorithmic hedge fund specializing in OTC energy derivatives). I've never been to Fort Collins. How does it compare with Boulder? There is no reason to be in Silicon Valley if your company is profitable, cash-flow positive, and self-financing. If not, then Silicon Valley is a superb place to raise capital; however, be prepared to pay dearly for it (both in equity and in cost of doing business). Thanks!
- falsestprophet 19y agoSorry, Top 40 engineering means nothing.
- rrival 19y ago
- epi0Bauqu 19y agoWhat metric do you think one should use to do the ranking? Absolute # of startups? Size of VC investment? Biggest nerd community?
- far33d 19y agoWhatever metric you want. By whatever metric that everyone agrees that the bay area and boston are 1 and 2.
- dpapathanasiou 19y agoNo, not NYC... most hackers are paid too well by i-banks and hedge funds to risk joining a startup, and those startup founders who do succeed don't stay here to become angels (as they do in SV and other startup hubs).
- portLAN 19y agoYou're in luck -- the last version of YC news on archive.org had it! http://www.darrenherman.com/2007/04/04/where-are-the-tech-startups/ http://www.darrenherman.com/2007/04/04/where-are-the-tech-st... The O'Reilly Radar post is here: http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/06/startup_centers.html http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/06/startup_centers.ht... The numbers are a year old but Seattle was #3 and NYC was #4. Although Tacoma is grouped in with Seattle, I'm not sure how meaningful that is -- it's kind of like grouping Oakland with Mountain View.
- danw 19y agoLondon?
- danw 19y agoMy reasoning for London: Lots of Big Co's have offices here such as Google, Yahoo, BBC, Skype, etc Lots of great startups: Last.fm, Moo, Crowdstorm, Mind Candy, Gottabet, etc Some great universities: Imperial, RCA, near to Oxford & Cambridge Good VCs: Index Ventures, Accel, Atlas plus Seedcamp Plenty of events: Ranging from weekly openCoffee's to big barcamps and Hackday and conferences like Future of Web Apps. Last nights Facebook Developer Garage pulled in 200 or so.
- rmason 19y agoSeattle, followed by Austin and then Ann Arbor and Madison in a tie for fifth
- menloparkbum 19y agoThere is no #3. Boston is WAY behind the Bay Area, even though die-hard Bostonians (er... I mean Cantabrigians) like to believe otherwise. If you don't feel that the Bay Area offers any advantage to your startup, you could probably be based almost anywhere.
- dotcoma 19y agoSeattle is probably number 2, isn't it?