3 ms·
It’s not that we’re unscientific, it’s just that we’re putting science aside unless it corroborates things. It’s totally a terrible process, there’s no evidence
by bloomingkales 2y ago
It’s not that we’re unscientific, it’s just that we’re putting science aside unless it corroborates things. It’s totally a terrible process, there’s no evidence.
Some people over time cannot put down the fact that there’s just way too many coincidences. If you just pile up what it took for you to be here (let’s include your one in a million chance of out swimming the other sperm along with a perfect planet, possibly perfect parents, list goes on), I think you’d at least agree it’s one miracle after another.
I can sit here and measure the anger on your face based on the metric of how red your face is but I’ll never know why you are angry. You can tell me, but even then, is it true? That’s the issue with science, that measuring and collecting observations won’t reveal the true nature. So it must be put aside, at least to investigate the other possibility.
I don’t see how people aren’t open minded about there being more than a clinical understanding of this experience.
From my other comment:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167691115002431 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01676...
Is it so hard to believe there is a global frequency?