- freedom of thought - freedom of expression - freedom of assembly and association Then political views should be protected in the same manner? Further, would

- freedom of thought - freedom of expression - freedom of assembly and association Then political views should be protected in the same manner? Further, would this mean that even mentioning: Problems with child abuse in the Catholic church are forbidden. Problems with LGBT rights in some Islamic groups. Since both can be seen as spreading hatred of people based on religion. What about spreading hatred about fat people? Why is that not included? This response is only intended to point out problems with such censorship as this bill defines. Spreading or receiving hateful harassment is wrong regardless of the why it should all be banned. Or hateful harassment should be protected under freedom of speech. To make a law that allows hateful harassment sometimes and makes it illegal in others is inherently not sustainable Since it will almost certainly have to keep expanding as other vulnerable groups are identified and thus deserve equal protection.