4 ms·
C-like equality (==), inequality (!=) and assignment (=) is such a missed opportunity here. One could go with "=", "=/=" and "<-" here while both preserving som
by magnat 2y ago
C-like equality (==), inequality (!=) and assignment (=) is such a missed opportunity here. One could go with "=", "=/=" and "<-" here while both preserving some sanity and shock factor.
- SirusCodes 2y agoThat's a pretty good idea, I can do this. Raised an issue for this - https://github.com/SirusCodes/AntiLang/issues/5 https://github.com/SirusCodes/AntiLang/issues/5
- Joker_vD 2y agoThat's Algol/Pascal's equality operator, Erlang's inequality operator (Pascal used "<>") and Haskell's binding operator (or whatever it's actually named inside the do-notation). In fact, Algol designer's considered using "<-" for assignment.