4 ms·
125 years? So has it ever been lower or it wasn't tracked?
by alpaccount 2y ago
125 years? So has it ever been lower or it wasn't tracked?
- The_Colonel 2y agoIt's total births, not birth rate. 125 years ago, the population was smaller, but the birth rate higher.
- ltadeut 2y agoif you bothered to read past the title: > The 2024 figure is a 5 per cent drop from the previous year and the lowest since records began during Japan’s Meiji era in 1899.
- nathanaldensr 2y agoWe'd love to read past the title, but sadly FT is paywalled.
- defrost 2y agoIs it? Article shows up fine for myself. Maybe because my browser scrubs cookies and always looks like a first time site visitor, maybe not locked for Australasian IP's. Dunno - never had an issue reading the FT though. All the same - https://archive.md/yBCh0 https://archive.md/yBCh0
- Izkata 2y agoProbably an IP thing then, all I see after the header is "Subscribe to unlock this article" and various rates/durations.
- dsq 2y agoYes, FT is paywalled by default.