3 ms·
It is totally valid to tell people not to criticize a project offered by someone who made it for their themselves or wants to offer the value to the public but
by Eisenstein 2y ago
It is totally valid to tell people not to criticize a project offered by someone who made it for their themselves or wants to offer the value to the public but doesn't have the resources to do everything perfectly. But this is not that, and I don't see a non-profit org behind it, so it appears to be something that is being offered on a quid pro quo basis. Thus we need to figure out where the value is being extracted and if the dev are cagey about it, that rings alarm bells.
- tyre 2y agoBrother. The default of the command is to generate locally. They don’t need to open source an entire web app. It’s easier to deploy themselves then deal with the burden of open sourcing and maintaining. This isn’t some conspiracy. It’s a tiny startup trying to ship something useful.
- Eisenstein 2y agoI think you misunderstand my comment. I was addressing whether or not it can be appropriate for someone to question an aspect of an open source project, and not whether this project was part of a conspiracy.