I think the only way it can truly be managed is by having the author of each side be a trusted and respected figure in their community. I think publishing the f

I think the only way it can truly be managed is by having the author of each side be a trusted and respected figure in their community. I think publishing the full drafts, editors notes, and revisions along with the piece would do a lot to make visible any deliberate efforts to frustrate one side. I don't think the "out of public view" drafting makes a big difference around this. I actually think making the drafting and revision process public during the drafting would have more corrosive effects on the process. In that one side can push and set a narrative without the other side having opportunity to respond. Anyway, I don't think any editorial system can be fully hardened against the editor leaving imprints of their viewpoints on the piece, but I think this approach would be significantly more transparent than the current state of play.