3 ms·
Or for that matter, a transform that's learned from the data :) A neural net for the transform itself!
by monkfish328 2y ago
Or for that matter, a transform that's learned from the data :) A neural net for the transform itself!
- spot5010 2y agoThat would be super cool if it works! I’ve also wondered the same thing about activation functions. Why not let the algorithm learn the activation function?
- porridgeraisin 2y agoThis idea exists (the broad field is called neural architecture search), although you have to parameterize it somehow to allow gradient descent to happen. Here are examples: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.04759 https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.04759 https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.09529 https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.09529
- FuckButtons 2y agoMostly because of computational efficiency irrc, the non linearity doesn’t seem to have much impact, so picking one that’s fast is a more efficient use of limited computational resources.