3 ms·
I prefer wigglegrams. If you're looking for an example - Wikipedia page has one from 1927[1]! [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiggle_stereoscopy https://en.
by thih9 2y ago
I prefer wigglegrams. If you're looking for an example - Wikipedia page has one from 1927[1]!
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiggle_stereoscopy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiggle_stereoscopy
- blululu 2y agoWas going to say the same thing. Presenting stereo pairs has a lot of layout and resolution issues to say nothing of the fact that some people have stereo blindness to varying degrees (lazy eye is an extreme case). The author is correct that stereo depth can greatly enhance an image, but a wigglegram does this at full resolution with no visual puzzle solving.
- ilyagr 2y agoThank you! I have not, to this day, have been able to see any Magic Eye/Cross Eyed or similar images. A wigglegram is immediately trivial. I'd probably most appreciate a layout with one frame on the left, the wigglegram in the middle, and the other frame on the right, so that I can get a sense of both the distances and the detail.
- James_K 2y agoI'm slightly suspicious that this comment was written by a bird.
- dagss 2y agoWHAT... this is the first time in my life I have been able to see 3D with one eye! Closing one eye and I still see the depth effect. Main brain works very differently than I assumed... With this effect I guess one could make even people who are blind on one eye see in 3D