3 ms·
> but I'm not sure why they would Because that's the expectation that was set by Mullenwegs words and actions. Who ever said you need to be under oath for dece
by baobun 2y ago
> but I'm not sure why they would
Because that's the expectation that was set by Mullenwegs words and actions. Who ever said you need to be under oath for deception to take place?
- MassiveQuasar 2y agoApparently libel laws aren't a thing because you're not under oath now or something along those lines.
- nickff 2y agoPer my comment on another message, it seems like Matt was telling the truth, but not the whole truth, which is probably more than he was legally required to do.