> Offer real and significant benefits. Yeah! The criterion is just there like you said. > Do you have an opinion on the dotnet version of generics? I'm not f

> Offer real and significant benefits. Yeah! The criterion is just there like you said. > Do you have an opinion on the dotnet version of generics? I'm not familiar with dotnet languages, but I have much experience implementing generics, especially how to avoid getting the poor C++ templates. Also, I believe traits (not that of C++) and typeclasses (Rust/Haskell) are definitely needed, and it's already proven too, to pair with the generics feature. > Ceph. My former job was to write a distributed object storage in Go and it was heavily inspired by Ceph. But subset of the design could make much benefits for a smaller company, since the initial idea to write a new one was from the pain of doing rebalancing in Ceph... oh you want to know the solution? Manual partitioning and migration by our SRE/Ops team lol. It's unexpectedly effective.