3 ms·
> This isn't really professional - it felt wrong I don't see anything wrong with that tbh. If it works that's great since this means that you're bound by the c
by menaerus 2y ago
> This isn't really professional - it felt wrong
I don't see anything wrong with that tbh. If it works that's great since this means that you're bound by the compute power you have and not the amount of devs available at that moment. I guess this is what the wet dream is about.
- jasonjmcghee 2y agoWorking on two features at once is not weird pre-llms too. Though it's a scheduling problem rather than parallelism. CI tests are running for feature A while you work on feature B. If feature A fails, at some point you context switch back and work on it more etc
- menaerus 2y agoOf course, business incentive is to have people complete as much stuff as they can per time unit. I don't think I ever had a luck to work in an environment where anyone in the team wouldn't be working on multiple things at the same time. Truth to be told these weren't the traditional scrum or any other bs driven environment. More like high performance teams where pretty much anyone was quite exquisite.
- bhouston 2y agoI really should have just checked out the code twice locally or once per auto coder.