> Even though DigiCert’s TOU and MSA prohibited Alegeus from taking the action it did, once it filed for a TRO and the court almost immediately granted it, Digi

> Even though DigiCert’s TOU and MSA prohibited Alegeus from taking the action it did, once it filed for a TRO and the court almost immediately granted it, DigiCert’s hands were tied So did the judge just not read the TOU before signing the TRO? I wonder if the CAB forum would have standing to sue Alegeus and/or that judge for interfering with the PKI process with an invalid TRO.