You can disagree with expert historians who have researched their field, and sometimes you'll be right. But an amateur who uses AI and in 4 hours work has prod

You can disagree with expert historians who have researched their field, and sometimes you'll be right. But an amateur who uses AI and in 4 hours work has produced a complete falsehood seems more dangerous, in that it creates pollution very fast and easily, in a way real (mistaken or not) historians cannot. It's simply a lot of garbage, made very fast and easily. It has the potential to outcompete everything else.