4 ms·
> Don’t worry... that part was fiction, added by you, represented as if he said it.
by gosub100 2y ago
> Don’t worry...
that part was fiction, added by you, represented as if he said it.
- kulahan 2y agoIt is pretty clearly implied.
- gosub100 2y agoonly if you extend the definition of "endangered" , this argument/position hinges on the definition of a single word. the far left wants to extend the definition of that word to mean the most devastating, irreversible, "give-us-money-or-the-bird-gets-it" definition possible. The GP however, explains that the dire extreme doesn't necessarily reflect reality.
- lkramer 2y agoThanks for making it political... For what it's worth, the far right is perfectly capable of weaponize conservation. Think of the war on windmills.
- gotoeleven 2y agoIts always word games. The word games only work for so long before people realize they're being tricked. Environmentalists that were honest rather than sensational would probably be better for the environment in the long run.
- watwut 2y agoIt does not matter, conservatives will willify them all. And will lie about nature and about what environmentalists say. Stop this nonsense where republicans and their donors damage things, lie and then blame their opposition for not being perfect.