I agree, they are only starting the data flywheel there. And at the same time making users pay $200/month for it, while the competition is only charging $20/mo

I agree, they are only starting the data flywheel there. And at the same time making users pay $200/month for it, while the competition is only charging $20/month. And note, the system is now directly competing with "interns". Once the accuracy is competitive (is it already?) with an average "intern", there'd be fewer reasons to hire paid "interns" (more expensive than $200/month). Which is maybe a good thing? Fewer kids wasting their time/eyes looking at the computer screens?