11 ms·
If the autofocus is reliable, it will sit perfectly between the Ricoh GR III and the Leica Q3, which could be the right mix for some people GR III = ultra-comp
by tern 2y ago
If the autofocus is reliable, it will sit perfectly between the Ricoh GR III and the Leica Q3, which could be the right mix for some people
GR III = ultra-compact, fixed focal length, $1000, poor autofocus
Sigma BF = compact, interchangeable lens, $2000 + lenses, ??? autofocus
Leica Q3 = compact, fixed focal length, $6000, reliable autofocus
These cameras are loved by street photographers, casual landscape photographers, documentary / environmental portrait photographers, and there's a significant Japanese lifestyle photography scene ... I often wonder if Sigma has this market in mind, which is not so visible if you're not in Japan or don't know where to look on Instagram (dig into the #sigmafp / #sigmafpl tag and look for washed out / blue-tinted photos of flowers/nature, for instance).
The major downside is no stabilization, which will severely limit the shooting envelope compared to these other cameras. I shot with a Sigma FP for awhile and the combination of poor autofocus, no stabilization, no viewfinder, and it still being heavy compared to, say, a Fujifilm camera, made for a very limiting experience. This will, however, be a user-experience upgrade for people who are happy with FP (which, honestly, I still miss sometimes).