3 ms·

Highly misleading article and reporting. These were apparently hold overs from USDS, not DOGE hires. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/doge/21-doge-staffers-re

• insane_dreamer 2y ago
  It's not misleading. The article states they were originally USDS employees. Nonetheless when DOGE came into being, it became the USDS and changed its name, therefore all those USDS employees are DOGE employees and are resigning from DOGE not the USDS (which no longer exists). So the article is correct.
• blackeyeblitzar 2y ago
  The misleading detail on the holdovers, the lack of acknowledgment that these people are just not doing their job, the lack of context on how big or small 21 is - all of it is intentional. The outlets that run these stories, like the guardian, and the people who work at them, have a bias.
  • mnewme 2y ago
    Come on. That is ridiculous. Read the original letter, nothing biased about the article, just facts.