2 ms·
Arguably, GWT was too ambitious. That made it somewhat of a PITA to work with. J2CL is a much better approach (IMO) but is somewhat too little too late. The
by cogman10 2y ago
Arguably, GWT was too ambitious. That made it somewhat of a PITA to work with.
J2CL is a much better approach (IMO) but is somewhat too little too late.
The best analogy to what GWT was is ASP.NET Webforms but ran on the client. That extra baggage (along with an antiquated build system and setup) made it really hard to keep GWT up to date.
I'm excited to see Java bytecode->WASM though. Now that WASM ships with a GC we should see some really neat stuff in terms of the size of the runtime needed for an AOT bytecode->wasm.