> Would a judge not consider potential harm to each party if the TRO is granted or not? > If the CA could credibly point out they would face severe consequence

> Would a judge not consider potential harm to each party if the TRO is granted or not? > If the CA could credibly point out they would face severe consequences for failure to revoke, could that have an impact on? That would be an excellent reason to make sure to impose strict consequences on CAs without regard to whatever legal orders they're subject to, so that the next CA can point to those consequences when arguing against things like a TRO. "If you grant this TRO, the net effect will not be that you get what you want; the net effect will be to destroy our business and still not get what you want".