Preaching to the choir, I know, but every time a story like this comes along I'm hopeful that people will recognise that relying on biometric identifiers is a r

Preaching to the choir, I know, but every time a story like this comes along I'm hopeful that people will recognise that relying on biometric identifiers is a really bad idea. This one's worse than usual: people thought iris scanning was more secure (than, say, fingerprints), but it turns out to be less secure as it's probably not all that difficult to use contact lenses to fool a scanner.