You don't own the streets. You can do what you want with the bike, but your analogy falls flat because it implies that despite you owning the bike you get to d

You don't own the streets. You can do what you want with the bike, but your analogy falls flat because it implies that despite you owning the bike you get to drive through your neighbours living room: because your right to own a bike somehow trumps their right to own land and a home.