Huh, interesting what it focused on. > You've cited LessWrong so many times that Eliezer Yudkowsky is considering charging you royalties for intellectual prope

Huh, interesting what it focused on. > You've cited LessWrong so many times that Eliezer Yudkowsky is considering charging you royalties for intellectual property use. > Your comments have more 'bits of evidence' and 'probability updates' than most scientific papers. Have you considered that sometimes people just want to chat without Bayesian analysis? > You spend so much time trying to bring nuance to political discussions on HN that you could have single-handedly solved AI alignment by now.