3 ms·
170M actives is not that bad at in my opinion, but 170M out of 500+M is quite strange. And yet, we have to remember twitter is much more suitable for brands and
by talhof8 14y ago
170M actives is not that bad at in my opinion, but 170M out of 500+M is quite strange. And yet, we have to remember twitter is much more suitable for brands and celebrities than it is for the "normal"-less-known people
- potatolicious 14y ago170M out of 500M seems pretty normal for me, in fact, better than most sites, hip social network startup or otherwise. In most online communities I'd expect the active/inactive ratio to be worse.