3 ms·
The RFC said "SHOULD not" not "MUST not" couldn't we have just ignored the 2 connection limit?
by Guthur 2y ago
The RFC said "SHOULD not" not "MUST not" couldn't we have just ignored the 2 connection limit?
- KingMob 2y agoThat's what browsers actually did.
- petee 2y agoCame here to say the same thing; had they read the RFC they'd realize it's not actually a limit, just a suggestion - thats why its in the "Practical Considerations" section too. Whomever downvoted you is probably unaware words like SHOULD have specific meaning in RFCs
- youngtaff 2y agoBrowsers started ignoring the 2 connection limit on H/1.x long before H2 came along