First, I can't listen to this article so this makes their point kinda less relevant. > It is the most frequent (and information dense) Second, this is false.

First, I can't listen to this article so this makes their point kinda less relevant. > It is the most frequent (and information dense) Second, this is false. Voice is effective when the sensory context is available to both people, e.g. in the dinner table where "pass the salt" makes immediate sense. Otherwise it is an erratic form of communication, prone to misunderstanding, often repetitive and redundant. It is not more information dense, but it is the most immediate. The latency of AI applications makes its immediacy less useful.