4 ms·

Can someone link to (or post copies of) the offending questions/statements?

• infogulch 2y ago
  In the second paragraph: > Contrary to this statement, I received a letter from DigiCert’s lawyers, Wilson Sonsini, regarding posts made by Sectigo’s Chief Compliance Officer in bug 1910322. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1910322 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1910322
  • mdaniel 2y ago
    > The code worked in our original monolithic system but was not implemented properly when we moved to our micro-services systems :chefs_kiss:
    • crooked-v 2y ago
      As we all know, software isn't software unless it can immediately scale to having 12 billion users.
    • evil-olive 2y ago
      it gets even better: > We also found that the bug in the code was inadvertently remediated when engineering completed a user-experience enhancement project that collapsed multiple random value generation microservices into a single service.
      • tpxl 2y ago
        > multiple random value generation microservices Wot. They had _multiple_ services generating random numbers?
        • aragilar 2y ago
          It might mean multiple instances of the same code (which would explain why there might be commonalities)?
      • intelVISA 2y ago
        Some might see horror but I see a few genius level engineers 'working' 1hour a month rebuilding the same getrandom syscall. They hiring? :]