3 ms·

Musk's motivations are simple; the rich have been promised tax breaks, which means deep spending cuts. So gutting the parks service means no parks open to the p

Musk's motivations are simple; the rich have been promised tax breaks, which means deep spending cuts. So gutting the parks service means no parks open to the public, but balances a tax break to billionaires. Same for "science". That's a long term investment with long term returns. Kill that now for immediate tax breaks. Let someone else worry about the fallout 10 years from now. Then there's direct interest. The CFB regulates companies processing payments to protect consumers. X wants to process payments without that pesky oversight. CFB is gone. Musk and Trump sell this to the masses as saving money. Which the masses assume means lower taxes for them. Whereas the billionaires understand it's to remove services from the masses to route more money to themselves. The masses are easily duped - this is literally democracy in action.

jfengel 2y ago
In 2016 they had tax breaks without spending cuts. And he's not actually saving all that much money. The employees are only a small part of the budget. He's doing it because hate for government employees has been a talking point since Reagan. He's getting huge accolades for sticking it to the evildoers. It's popular and fun.
- trhway 2y ago
  that is the question - for example SpaceX needs FAA permits. With the federal employees severely cut in that future that Musk/Trump builds how that will be solved - 1. no FAA permits required or 2. SpaceX gets same-day service (or even total blanket exception) while everybody else waits 3 years?
  - jaybro867 2y ago
    [dead]
vel0city 2y ago
> So gutting the parks service means no parks open to the public, but balances a tax break to billionaires That's the stupid thing in the end. Gut the parks service, here's your $500 tax break on your several hundred million+ income.
- bruce511 2y ago
  It's a lot more than $500. For the few. It's $0 for the masses. A 1% reduction in corporate tax means millions in their pockets. Billionaires aren't the ones going to national parks. So they don't care if they're closed.

jfengel 2y ago

In 2016 they had tax breaks without spending cuts. And he's not actually saving all that much money. The employees are only a small part of the budget. He's doing it because hate for government employees has been a talking point since Reagan. He's getting huge accolades for sticking it to the evildoers. It's popular and fun.

trhway 2y ago
that is the question - for example SpaceX needs FAA permits. With the federal employees severely cut in that future that Musk/Trump builds how that will be solved - 1. no FAA permits required or 2. SpaceX gets same-day service (or even total blanket exception) while everybody else waits 3 years?
- jaybro867 2y ago
  [dead]

vel0city 2y ago

> So gutting the parks service means no parks open to the public, but balances a tax break to billionaires That's the stupid thing in the end. Gut the parks service, here's your $500 tax break on your several hundred million+ income.

bruce511 2y ago
It's a lot more than $500. For the few. It's $0 for the masses. A 1% reduction in corporate tax means millions in their pockets. Billionaires aren't the ones going to national parks. So they don't care if they're closed.