good location = higher rent = food better attract people I'm not saying that holds up, only that it's not clear to me that "good location" = skimping on actual

good location = higher rent = food better attract people I'm not saying that holds up, only that it's not clear to me that "good location" = skimping on actually being good. To go the other extreme, I guess all the best restaurants in the USA are in Wyoming since they arguably have worst locations (low population density = low traffic) so they must have to concentrate on food. Yea, ... no.