5 ms·
> they're unavailable for the foreseeable future on higher priorities Need I respond to that?
by scoot 2y ago
> they're unavailable for the foreseeable future on higher priorities
Need I respond to that?
- delichon 2y agoIf you know the secret to getting a company to prioritize potential security problems that haven't yet emerged in forty years over meeting payroll, please share.
- grayhatter 2y agowhy does it sound like you're defending the argument of; I couldn't act ethically because I had to make money.
- delichon 2y agoMy paycheck depends on reconciling myself to it. Should I quit possibly my last job before retirement in a bleak job market to protest my manager's decision to protect her job and mine by putting revenue before protecting jane@doe.com's login from being stolen for the Nth time? Am I the bad guy?
- grayhatter 2y agoIt's not my place to define your ethics for you. I'm pointing out so any other readers can be innoculated from accidentally stumbling into this ethical minefield. I'm not telling you stealing bread so your family doesn't starve is unethical, I'm pointing out it's stealing. No idea if you're the bad guy, but you're not the ~~good guy~~ hero, no.
- delichon 2y agoI'm a participant in sub-criminal negligence rather than stealing. I'd call that a lesser offense. And it's a failure I have mitigated by working to protect the data. I can't claim innocence, but I sleep OK.
- grayhatter 2y agoIt's also not about bread, because that was just an analogy. I would sleep ok too, until something bad happened and people I had a responsibility to protect got hurt. Then I wouldn't sleep so well... Turns out humans are really bad at risk calculations.
- josefritzishere 2y agoAs your attorney I would not advise admitting that on a public website. Even posting it implicates this website in the risk registry.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]