2 ms·
It was my understanding the request was to have the core maintainer take on the additional task of supporting the rust API on top of the existing wrapper. I co
by Joel_Mckay 2y ago
It was my understanding the request was to have the core maintainer take on the additional task of supporting the rust API on top of the existing wrapper.
I could be wrong, but a branch or fork seems like the easiest solution. =3
- steveklabnik 2y agoYou misunderstood.
- dralley 2y agoYour understanding is completely wrong. There was no such request, and that concern was almost immediately addressed by spelling out very directly that no such expectation existed. https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/2b9b75d1-eb8e-494a-b05f-59f75c92e6ae@marcan.st/T/#mace05a0a97522193876bb38e6f64a6ca941a59d8 https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/2b9b75d1-eb8e-494a-b0...