> It was rustacean-proposed changes on the C side that led to this drama. Why would you say something like that? From the e-mail [0] the article is based on:

> It was rustacean-proposed changes on the C side that led to this drama. Why would you say something like that? From the e-mail [0] the article is based on: > The fact is, the pull request you objected to DID NOT TOUCH THE DMA LAYER AT ALL. > It was literally just another user of it, in a completely separate subdirectory, that didn't change the code you maintain in _any_ way, shape, or form. [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/2/20/2066 https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/2/20/2066