5 ms·
I was gonna reply something similar too. The only "counters" people have when talking about Clojure (that I see, as a non-Clojurian) are pretty weak, and are us
by sundarurfriend 2y ago
I was gonna reply something similar too. The only "counters" people have when talking about Clojure (that I see, as a non-Clojurian) are pretty weak, and are usually: "it uses JVM, and JVM bad mmmkay" and the typical lazy dismissal of Lisps as "omg it's parantheses everywhere".
- worthless-trash 2y agoMy new favourite is am seeing is clojure doesnt have enough syntactic sugar. SMH.
- maleldil 2y agoAdd "dynamic language" in this day and age where everyone thinks static languages are cool again.