5 ms·
I would be really interested to see some analysis on the latest ~50m accounts because I've noticed an insane amount of bot accounts recently. They all follow th
by citricsquid 14y ago
I would be really interested to see some analysis on the latest ~50m accounts because I've noticed an insane amount of bot accounts recently. They all follow the same pattern: Never tweet (or tweet once), follow ~2000 people and are being followed by ~3 and have a bio + avatar. They're used by the Twitter follower selling companies and there's an absolute metric fucktonne of these accounts, some examples of such accounts:
http://twitter.com/Yahairayqlcd http://twitter.com/Yahairayqlcd
http://twitter.com/Kenyetta992 http://twitter.com/Kenyetta992
http://twitter.com/Jade_482 http://twitter.com/Jade_482
http://twitter.com/Mozella_nxi http://twitter.com/Mozella_nxi
http://twitter.com/Alane508 http://twitter.com/Alane508
It's becoming a really big problem, every day I come across accounts that have bought followers\* (a few belonging to HN users) and it's... disappointing. Inevitable, but disappointing. I started putting together a website for checking if someone had bought their followers but haven't found the desire to finish it yet, but there are so many that do it, anywhere from purchasing 4,000 to 80,000 followers which can be done for ~$300.
I've been reporting the people doing this to Twitter but nothing has been done about it, ultimately it looks good for Twitter metrics so I doubt they care that there are people with 80k fake followers, that's an extra 80k users for their investors to salivate over.
As a side note, it's fun to pick out a random account (like those listed above) and see who they're following, there are some people you'd not expect to be purchasing followers that are. An alternate theory is that Twitter is responsible (after all, how can they not detect these obvious bots?) but I can't see why... well I can, but I don't think they would.
*I'm probably alone in this but people that buy followers really irk me because I like numbers to be accurate. The site I started making had a directory of people that bought followers, I'm wondering if I should finish it up, I figure it would be interesting for people to see that a large number of "media personalities" are just buying up their followers.
- untog 14y agoIt's becoming a really big problem, every day I come across accounts that have bought followers I am followed by users that match the pattern you're describing, but I assure you I have never bought them. It's not coincidence that the accounts are of attractive young women- they want reciprocal follows. I am almost always followed shortly after tweeting, so I would venture to guess that they are plugged into the Twitter API's "sample" feed, and sometimes I am unlucky enough to be included in that sample.
- citricsquid 14y agoI don't see any followers on your Twitter account that match this pattern. I have a small number of followers (about 1,100) and I've never had an account like the type I listed (avatar, bio, ~3 followers, ~2000 following) follow me. The Twitter account I use for the website I work for which has 10,000 followers that are follows mainly through our website (we have the "follow us" button on a high trafficed page) are mainly from Twitter "lurkers" and I can't find a single one that matches the purchased followers pattern I mentioned, you're welcome to check yourself: http://twitter.com/i/#!/redstonewire/followers http://twitter.com/i/#!/redstonewire/followers On top of that I've checked with all the accounts I suspect of purchasing followers when they gained their followers: it's always within a few seconds that they've done from ~1,000 to 5,000, or 1,000 to 60,000. Here's an example of one account I was monitoring, you can see the jump from 2,000 to 4,000 took place at the same time: http://i.imgur.com/jUMNj.jpg http://i.imgur.com/jUMNj.jpg and here's another that went from 0 to 60k: http://i.imgur.com/KwJZj.png http://i.imgur.com/KwJZj.png I don't mean these sort of accounts in isolation: 1 follower matching the pattern out of 100 is fine, but when a user has 10,000 followers and 9,900 match that pattern don't you think that's an indication of follower purchases? Another type I didn't mention are the type that are legitimate active users that have authorised applications that are using this auth to generate follows on demand. These are interesting but not relevant because they're not created accounts just for followers, but legit accounts being used.
- gglanzani 14y agoSame here. But as soon as they follow me (well, when I check) I mark them as spam and Twitter deletes them from my "Followers" list. I think I'd have 3 times as much followers by leaving them there.
- damncabbage 14y agoI never see these accounts when using the Twitter website, but always when I'm using Tweetbot. I'm guessing there's a layer in between that clears it up for Twitter's own tools, and the third-party tools are left to clean up the stream themselves. (On the other hand, Tweetbot has no in-stream ads, which mean both of these things are happening in the same "post-processing" layer.)
- dpeck 14y agoQuick plug for a co-worker who presented some of our findings on this topic last week during security bsides in las vegas. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6evQ8fU49Zg&list=UU4PBNDLlS4d75MP0xxcukGA&index=2&feature=plcp http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6evQ8fU49Zg&list=UU4PBNDL... The economies of it are fascinating, and honestly I don't know what people think they're going to gain from it, as we haven't seen much correlation between buying followers and having an actual increase in the number of real followers. Everyone from wannabe musicians to politicians are doing it though.