3 ms·
The problem is, I don't think their new ideas are good ideas. Civ switching was really not fun when Humankind did it, and the eras system doing a lot of progres
by bigstrat2003 2y ago
The problem is, I don't think their new ideas are good ideas. Civ switching was really not fun when Humankind did it, and the eras system doing a lot of progress resetting seems to undermine the entire point of playing well in the early eras. And to make matters worse, these things are in service of solving a problem I don't even agree is a problem. I think late game Civ has always been fun and enjoyable, it didn't need them to completely overhaul the formula to make it so.
I do want to be open minded - maybe these things are more fun than they seem to me. But I'm also not going to drop $70 just to find out. So until they release a demo, put it on game pass, or have a deep discount sale, I'm not going to risk my money on this one.
- consp 2y agoI did pay the 70 and by the time I found out I hated the concept the return window was over. The game has a broken UI, broke gameplay and everything which should be included is dlc. Try playing on a random map. Oh no you can't as the game requires two continents. Wait two years and then buy for 15$. At least you feel less cheated by then.
- nosioptar 2y agoThis is a great reason to pirate a game before buying it.
- Elohahs 2y agoGood idea.Maybe you should sit this one out,Bigrat.