3 ms·
I think we should just address what is “embarrassing” then Twenty years ago I was in a group of old technology thought leaders who spent the meeting worried ab
by yieldcrv 2y ago
I think we should just address what is “embarrassing” then
Twenty years ago I was in a group of old technology thought leaders who spent the meeting worried about people playing computer games as a character with a different gender as their own
They wanted to find a way to prevent that, especially in an online setting
To them, this would be embarrassing for the individual, for society, and for any corporation involved or intermediary
But in reality this was the most absurd thing to even consider as a problem, it was always completely benign, was already commonplace, and nobody ever removed ad dollars or shareholder support or grants because of this reality
The same will be true this “LLM security” field
- plaguuuuuu 2y agoIt's not quite the same. "LLM security" is not security for the users, it's security for OpenAI etc against lawsuits or government enacting AI safety laws.
- yieldcrv 2y agothe similarity being that it will remain a waste of time
- wredcoll 2y ago> Twenty years ago I was in a group of old technology thought leaders who spent the meeting worried about people playing computer games as a character with a different gender as their own Please, tell me more. I want, I need, all the details. This sounds hilarious.