3 ms·
So basically because someone did something bad to them, they have become unethical thieves? And you're fine with it? (I know nothing about them, but your descr
by ars 2y ago
So basically because someone did something bad to them, they have become unethical thieves? And you're fine with it?
(I know nothing about them, but your description of them ... yikes. You are making them out to be pretty terrible people.)
- rexpop 2y ago[flagged]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- defrost 2y agoTo be clear here, it appears that deviantbit described the Shawnee as: flat out thieves rexpop described the Shawnee as: genocide survivors [.. that] operate in a landscape that is existentially hostile to them [..] from an immeasurable disadvantage. and you've now declared calling them "genocide survivors" as "making them out to be pretty terrible people" while casting no judgement on the description as "flat out thieves" ? Did you reply to the correct comment?
- ars 2y agorexpop essentially confirmed that they are thieves and then said it's correct for them to be thieves. Saying someone is a permanent and irredeemable thief, is worse than saying someone stole something.
- defrost 2y ago"essentially confirmed" with airquotes is what escalates them from alleged thieves to permanent and irredeemable thieves in your mind? That's interesting. Their comment reads more as someone still angry about stolen land, stolen children, Indian boarding schools, stealth abortions, and other events which still touch living people and cause them to be upset when reading allegations of theft.
- rexpop 2y agoI'm saying that calling them thieves is genocide apologia.