3 ms·
“Cut all of it” is a lazy and exceptionally dangerous response. There are an enormous number of government services for which the benefit to society is straigh
by stouset 2y ago
“Cut all of it” is a lazy and exceptionally dangerous response.
There are an enormous number of government services for which the benefit to society is straight multiples of the cost. Throwing out the baby with the bathwater is an phenomenally efficient way to make sure we all suddenly start paying more.
For a blindingly obvious example, see universal healthcare (or more specifically, our country’s lack of it). As the one developed economy without it, we pay multiples of what other people do for worse results. Consider me not particularly enthusiastic about finding out what else we can start paying more for to receive worse results.
> The fact that DOGE is only focused on the items it has access to is not a logical critique of DOGE’s effort.
Of course it fucking is. Just like it is, was, and continues to be a valid critique that California asking residents to cut back on water use when the aggregate of all urban use counts for about 8% of the water is a pointless waste of time, resources, and political energy.
Instead of actually tackling deficits and government spending, they’re putting on a show while cutting to the bone extremely valuable services we rely on. NOAA and FAA are critical for air travel. NASA, the NSF, and scientific research funding in general are critical for our continued technological dominance and for attracting the best and brightest to our country. The CFPB has done incredible work in protecting individual consumers from the worst of banking practices. The parks service, USFS, and everything else under the department of the interior protect our remaining natural spaces which can never be reclaimed once lost.
This is just a microscopic fraction of what’s being dismantled in front of our eyes, and all for the “benefit” of pointlessly saving relative pennies.
For fuck’s sake, as a high-earning, wealthy taxpayer: tax me more. And anyone who’s in the upper echelons of our economy that isn’t saying this while seeing the conditions the rest of our country and world live in is unbelievably narrow-minded, ignorant, selfish, straight up evil, or more likely a combination of all the above.
- ethagknight 2y agoThis is the ideological divide, and I voted one way, you voted the other way. The divide: you believe more taxes is the solution, despite today's taxes being hire than any point in US history. Taxes per capita have ballooned over the US's history. I believe today's government is in the business of self justification, that if we take $1 away from some program, society as we know it grinds to a halt. The switch in your argument to "it's just a drop in the bucket" is odd to me. For one, I hope the same sentiment carries over to other components of government. Massive rein-in of spend. FAA has not been canceled; instead, its unchecked spending is being challenged. Same for the rest of these programs. FAA's 2025 budget is nearly 4x the 1995 budget, despite serving roughly the same number of airports. There may be 30% more flights today than in 1995, with all those occurring at the same airports we had back in 1995. How do you explain a 4x mission scope creep? Inflation address a bit, but ATC should be getting more efficient with technology, not more complicated. The real answer, theres a lot of misappropriated funding and spending that needs to be reeled in. It is ok to disagree, I nonetheless adjure you to voluntarily pay more taxes. This is quite an attack, to say if I dont agree with you, then I am a combination of these things: >>anyone who’s in the upper echelons of our economy that isn’t saying this while seeing the conditions the rest of our country and world live in is unbelievably narrow-minded, ignorant, selfish, straight up evil, or more likely a combination of all the above.