3 ms·
So, the formula is really about making any integer with three 2s, but historical precedent calls the game with four 2s more interesting, so the (stronger) resul
by lblume 2y ago
So, the formula is really about making any integer with three 2s, but historical precedent calls the game with four 2s more interesting, so the (stronger) result is monkey-patched by replacing a 2 with sqrt(2+2).
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- hinkley 2y agoWhy not use 3 2’s to make n + 2 or n - 2? That’s a lot easier than making a subscript so complicated. This is the Curse of Knowledge. OP stared too long into the abyss.