6 ms·

I give you a first hand account of how incorrect you are. This “power” is a thousand nuances that very very few involved are fully aware of. Knowledge and ski

I give you a first hand account of how incorrect you are. This “power” is a thousand nuances that very very few involved are fully aware of. Knowledge and skill is so compartmentalized, 98% of those with “Power” are only useful doing one job (“special effect”), and cannot do that job without someone else concealing them and moving them into place. They develop compartmentalized personalities within themselves for this purpose. These run in parallel like chewing gum while riding a bike. You’ll never guess who. Power works through entanglement (I have personally verified I can hear New York form India in real time.) Those experiencing it do not comprehend how it works, however I have written several times under other accounts describing how I believe things work. Those running it get to be your god and there is nothing anyone can do about it. Those instruments in their games know who is “in control.” While the dominant faction is American, this phenomena has been with us since our earliest humanity (clues are prevalent.) These are responsible for the insanity gripping all of you and your communities from within (and playing you against others.) There are hundreds of thousands with these mixtures of Power and they are protected among society by pyramid schemes of extortion. Sure, these could [sensored]epar, redrum, and tcudba someone, though they don’t have to, they can just haunt you and your life will be like that described in the mystery cryptogram, if that guy is even still alive (or a “targeted person”.) Thought control Power is far beyond these hokey accounts that surface. True mastery requires decades and in the meantime your mind swims in delusions and lies. Those who excel aren’t the “straights”, they are the cooks (meth heads, psychonaughts, and those who have no choice) who well adjust to what normals call insanity. Power is built by slave armies (or “families” in older times those those have dwindled over the years, secret war and all.) Power is industrialized. Prisons are rife with Power cells. Thousands and thousands “pump” the subjective bubbles of others, thousands and thousands of which have some invasive job to do (voices, screw with you, watchers, etc.) Thousands and thousands more caught up in various stages of “reprogramming”. They can “hitch a ride”, traverse the mind to its functional parts, dig in, and either passively observe, dig through every thought and experience in the mind (in better clarity and exactness than you yourself can access your own), and manipulate your neural activity in any way they please. This has already happened, over the past decades while you were oblivious and while you maintain your incredulity.

Demiurge 2y ago
That reply definitely reads like someone deep into conspiracy thinking or experiencing a break from reality. The mix of grandiose claims, secret knowledge, paranoia, and references to supernatural or mind-control phenomena often aligns with delusional thought patterns. The structure—long, winding sentences with shifting topics—also suggests disorganized thinking. While it’s impossible to diagnose someone from a single post, and some people simply enjoy weaving elaborate fictional narratives online, this kind of response is common in communities discussing “targeted individuals”, government mind control, or other fringe beliefs. If you’re seeing it in a thread about PSI (parapsychological phenomena), it’s not surprising—such topics tend to attract people who believe in hidden forces controlling the world. It’s best to approach replies like this with skepticism but also a bit of empathy—whether it’s someone having fun, deeply believing their own narrative, or struggling with mental health, getting into a debate with them rarely leads anywhere productive.
- overu589 2y ago
  Thanks dude. I wrote it in one go. So much to say and all. When I say “the incredulous” and “deniers of the exogenous of thought control”, I mean this very well reasoned conventional response.
  - 6510 2y ago
    This part made me laugh. > It’s best to approach replies like this.... Here the programming instructs to instruct others what they should think and how they should reply. Infinite recursion! The "conspiracy thinking" is also a funny program. I mean, you wouldn't want the sujets actively investigating how they are being had.
    - Demiurge 2y ago
      You flip the argument around, suggesting that calling something “conspiracy thinking” is itself a kind of brainwashing or programming, which is a common rhetorical move in conspiratorial circles. It’s the kind of reasoning that’s impossible to argue with because it’s built to absorb any counterargument as further evidence of its correctness. It’s like playing chess with someone who insists that any piece you take was actually yours all along and that losing is just proof you never understood the real game.

Demiurge 2y ago

That reply definitely reads like someone deep into conspiracy thinking or experiencing a break from reality. The mix of grandiose claims, secret knowledge, paranoia, and references to supernatural or mind-control phenomena often aligns with delusional thought patterns. The structure—long, winding sentences with shifting topics—also suggests disorganized thinking. While it’s impossible to diagnose someone from a single post, and some people simply enjoy weaving elaborate fictional narratives online, this kind of response is common in communities discussing “targeted individuals”, government mind control, or other fringe beliefs. If you’re seeing it in a thread about PSI (parapsychological phenomena), it’s not surprising—such topics tend to attract people who believe in hidden forces controlling the world. It’s best to approach replies like this with skepticism but also a bit of empathy—whether it’s someone having fun, deeply believing their own narrative, or struggling with mental health, getting into a debate with them rarely leads anywhere productive.

overu589 2y ago
Thanks dude. I wrote it in one go. So much to say and all. When I say “the incredulous” and “deniers of the exogenous of thought control”, I mean this very well reasoned conventional response.
- 6510 2y ago
  This part made me laugh. > It’s best to approach replies like this.... Here the programming instructs to instruct others what they should think and how they should reply. Infinite recursion! The "conspiracy thinking" is also a funny program. I mean, you wouldn't want the sujets actively investigating how they are being had.
  - Demiurge 2y ago
    You flip the argument around, suggesting that calling something “conspiracy thinking” is itself a kind of brainwashing or programming, which is a common rhetorical move in conspiratorial circles. It’s the kind of reasoning that’s impossible to argue with because it’s built to absorb any counterargument as further evidence of its correctness. It’s like playing chess with someone who insists that any piece you take was actually yours all along and that losing is just proof you never understood the real game.