There seems to be a disingenuous attempt by many respondents to get readers to focus on definitions and ignore the trends. I suggest you to look at the second

There seems to be a disingenuous attempt by many respondents to get readers to focus on definitions and ignore the trends. I suggest you to look at the second graph showing the fatal/wounded data pretty much mirrors the incident data. Then ask yourself if this is problematic. EDIT: Here's one account of what these statistics mean for those involved: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/23/health/teacher-shooting-parkland-florida.html https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/23/health/teacher-shooting-p...