Your argument is, violence is an option, because your preferred candidates don't win as much as you like? I would see a point in saying voting is pointless, be

Your argument is, violence is an option, because your preferred candidates don't win as much as you like? I would see a point in saying voting is pointless, because no matter who you vote for, all end up on the payroll of the people doing enshitification. But not because your side always loose. Because this then won't likely change when you turn to violence - your side will be still the smaller one and we tried the whole voting thing, to not have all arguments solved with bloodshed.