3 ms·
I find it curios that he does not mention Thin as a webserver which is good for streaming. Thin was perhaps the first ruby webserver which got good support for
by jeltz 14y ago
I find it curios that he does not mention Thin as a webserver which is good for streaming. Thin was perhaps the first ruby webserver which got good support for streaming responses. While Rainbows! and Puma might be better at least Thin should deserve a mention due to its popularity alone. It is way more downloaded than both Rainbows! and Puma together.
Is there some problem with running Thin together with stream in rails 4?
- tenderlove 14y agoAh, sorry. I forgot to mention thin. I will update the article. I just mentioned the web servers I've tested with! :)
- jeltz 14y agoGood to know. I was worried there could be some bad interaction between rails and the eventmachine. :)
- bascule 14y agoI suspect there will be bad interactions with EventMachine as it doesn't have a flow control model for writes and will just accept an unbounded amount of data into its write buffer. This is a big problem if you have slow consumers.
- ZoFreX 14y agoRails + SSE + Thin = a dream come true for me. Thank you for the hard work you're putting in!