3 ms·
And that is the problem. Those officers who barely remember the incident’s details use those reports to “refresh” their memory, and then testify to these detail
by therealpygon 2y ago
And that is the problem. Those officers who barely remember the incident’s details use those reports to “refresh” their memory, and then testify to these details that they no longer recall as “facts”. Given that a police report is effectively testimony, why would anyone consider allowing AI written reports as facts/evidence? I would rather a poorly written accurate report of what was witnessed by an officer, over an AI written report that “resembles” the facts witnessed.
- Terr_ 2y agoYeah, it's literally adding noise to a report to make it longer, while also encouraging falsified memories inside the officers. As an absolute bare minimum, all the initial data that was fed into the LLM needs to be preserved for the lifetime of the generated report and available to defense counsel.